Monday, November 26, 2012

A Series On The Birth of Signaling and The Evolution of Diameter in The Cload



History of Signaling
By: Lysandria G Serrano
Introduction
For those of us in the world of technology, specifically the telecommunications world, who are NOT engineers but may work in the supporting roles such as myself, may struggle with learning just what exactly is signaling and where does it originate?  I am currently completing my MBA in Organizational Development and am building my career in a great telecommunications company that specializes in a technology called Diameter.  So here is what I have learned with the help of a great textbook and the fantastic minds of our Products/Solutions Engineers for Diametriq.
Origination
If you who are looking for a better understanding of signaling within the world of Diameter, it may help to understand just where signaling originated. Upon researching, it was discovered that all routes of information on the history of Signaling came from the same source: Signaling System No. 7 (SS7): Protocol, Architecture, and Service, authored by Mr. Lee Dryburgh and Jeff Hewett.  Below are some excerpts from this book to help aide in understanding where Signaling originated.
To appreciate signaling in today's network and its role in future networks, let's examine the history of signaling. The history of signaling has been inextricably linked to the history of telecommunications and, in particular, switching. As telecommunications advances, so do the signaling systems that support it.
What is signaling? The International Telecommunications Union Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) defines signaling as: "The exchange of information (other than by speech) specifically concerned with the establishment, release and other control of calls, and network management, in automatic telecommunications operation." SS7 was defined as an international standard by ITU-T in its 1980 (Yellow Book) Q.7XX-series recommendations.
In telecommunications, the network's components must indicate (that is, signal) certain information to each other to coordinate themselves for providing services. As such, the signaling network can be considered the telecommunications network's nervous system. It breathes life into the infrastructure. Richard Manterfield, author of Telecommunications Signaling, has stated this poetically:
"Without signaling, networks would be inert and passive aggregates of components. Signaling is the bond that provides dynamism and animation, transforming inert components into a living, cohesive and powerful medium."

1889-1976
The earliest telephone switches were manual; operators used a switchboard and wire cords to connect and disconnect all calls. The first manual exchange occurred in 1878 in New Haven, Connecticut. It was introduced to avoid the imminent problem of running wires from each telephone to every other telephone (a fully meshed topology). The first manual switch appeared in Great Britain in 1879. It was also within this same year that subscribers came to be called by numbers rather than by names. Within a decade of introducing the manual switch, the United States had 140,000 subscribers and a staggering 8000 exchanges—that is, a switch for every 17.5 subscribers!
A subscriber who was connected to a manual switch would crank a lever to electronically send an alerting signal that lit up a bulb on the operator's switchboard. The operator would then connect her telephone to the calling line, and ask for the called number. Next the operator would connect her telephone to the called line, where she would place a ringing signal. If the called party answered the call, the operator would establish the connection by plugging in a cord between the two terminal jacks on the switchboard.



Signaling, as we know it today, began around 1889 with the invention of the Strowger exchange (which was patented 1891). The Strowger exchange was an electromechanical device that provided automatic switching using the simple idea of two-motion selectors for establishing calls between two subscribers. It was also known as a step-by-step switch because it followed pre-wired switching stages from start to finish. Strowgers' dial telephone is considered the precursor of today's touch-tone phone. It had three buttons: one for hundreds, one for tens, and one for units. To call the number 322, the caller had to push the hundreds button three times, the tens button two times, and the units button two times. In 1896 the Automatic Electric Company developed a rotary dial to generate the pulses. This method of transmitting the dialed digits became known as pulse dialing and was commonplace until the latter half of the twentieth century, when tone dialing became available.
Even in Great Britain in 1930, the majority of all local and long distance calls were still connected manually through an operator. But gradually, calls placed between subscribers served by the same local switch could be dialed without the help of an operator. Therefore, only subscriber signaling was required because an operator would perform any inter-switch signaling manually. In the decades that followed, it became possible to dial calls between subscribers who were served by nearby switches. Thus the requirement for network signaling was born. Most large U.S. cities had automatic exchanges by 1940.
Direct Distance Dialing (DDD) was introduced in the United States in the 1950s. DDD allowed national long distance calls to be placed without operator assistance, meaning that any switch in the United States could route signaling to any other switch in the country. International Direct Distance Dialing (IDDD) became possible in the 1960s, thus creating the requirement for signaling between international switches.
1976 to Present Day
Another form of signaling was introduced in 1976: Common Channel Signaling (CCS). CCS has been used to implement applications beyond the scope of basic telephone service, including Intelligent Networks (INs), supplementary services, and signaling in cellular mobile networks. As you will learn, SS7 is the modern day CCS system that is used for network signaling. As with any technical subject, signaling can be split into a number of classifications. The broadest classification is whether the signaling is subscriber or networked signaling.
Network signaling takes place between nodes in the core network. This is generally from the local switch, through the core network, and to the destination local switch—in other words, between the calling and the called party switch.





For obvious reasons, the signaling system employed on the local loop (between the subscriber and the local switch) differs from that which is used in the core network. The subscriber must only generate a limited number of signals: on or off hook, called party digits, and possibly a few commands for supplementary services.
In comparison, a modern core network must perform very complex signaling, such as those to support database driven services like Local Number Portability (LNP), credit or calling card validation, and cellular roaming. Therefore, subscriber signaling systems are simple compared to modern network signaling systems.
Network signaling was previously implemented using Channel Associated Signaling (CAS) techniques and systems. However, for the past two decades, it has been replaced with Common Channel Signaling (CCS) systems. Signaling System No. 7 (SS7) is almost the exclusive CSS system; thus, CCS can almost be taken to refer exclusively to the use of SS7. SS7 is both network architecture and a series of protocols that provide telecommunications signaling.
SS7 to Diameter
When cellular/mobile networks were being built the SS7 technology was built into its architecture, the 2G mobile core. This architecture in the 2G mobile core uses SS7 to control signaling that controls communication from voice to data network elements then to the centralized database.
As 2G grew and evolved into 3G, the SS7 controlled the signaling communication between the voice networks and the centralized databases. What about data networks?  The SS7 was utilized in the 3G in conjunction with Diameter to control signaling to communicate from the data networks to the centralized databases.  This is the point to where Diameter is introduced in the signaling realm.
What is Diameter? In layman terms Diameter is the evolved product of SS7 and controls the signaling within networks of voice, data and multi-media services. In today's 4G/LTE world Diameter has now overtaken SS7 and controls the signaling communication from the data network to the centralized databases.  Diameter also does this same control of signaling from the voice networks to the data networks then to the centralized databases.
In closing it is truly amazing when you look back at how signaling has evolved trough time. Beginning with signals telling an operator to connect one line to another for people to communicate; to the simple light handed tough of a button or touch screen to relay a text, picture or voice to another. Behind the scenes, or shall we say "behind the network" there is an ongoing evolution in the mobile core world of how voice and data is controlled and sent to centralized databases that allows us to stay connected in our small networked worlds!





Resources

ITU-T Rec. Q.7 http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Q.700/en
ITU-T Rec. Q.9 (11/88) Vocabulary of Switching and Signaling Terms.
Manterfield, R. Telecommunications Signaling. New York, New York; IEEE Publishing, 1999.
Dryburgh, L., Hewett, J.  Signaling System No. 7 (SS7/C7): Protocol, Architecture, and Services

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Just Some Fun Facts...



Physicists Invent (Tiny) Working Tractor Beam, World Becomes Instantly More Awesome







You guys, hold the phone. Drop whatever you’re doing right now. Is it dropped? Yes? Good. We have tractor beams now! Like where you zap a thing with a laser and pull it toward you with beam power? Yeah, those! We have those now. Even though they are super tiny and effective only on microscopic items like silica spheres suspended in water for right now, they are still working tractor beams, and now that we have the principle down, they are pretty much only going to get cooler from here. If you can’t get excited about that, I don’t even know what to say, as I have to assume you are already dead inside.

The new tractor beam design uses a special type of laser known as Bessel beams. Rather than a single beam, Bessel beams are transmitted as concentric circles that converge around the point they’re directed at. This gives the beams a unique quality. If you place a small object between the source of the beam and its destination, the concentric rings of the Bessel beam can reform around the object. That makes it possible for Bessel beams to pull or push objects — a quality of the beams that had been hypothetical until now.
After working with single Bessel beams to try and perfect a tractor beam and failing, New York University physicists David Ruffner and David Grier assembled a device that overlaps two Bessel beams. That overlap, combined with a slight distortion of the beams from a specialized lens, creates a strobing effect in the beams, producing enough energy to pull tiny grains of silica back toward the source of the beams.
The researchers’ work may not be right for tractor beams of the future, which will be used to assemble our space stations and hold extraterrestrial ships in place so we can board and raid them. Scaling up the current design would mean using a ton of energy, and probably destroying whatever objects you were attempting to manipulate with the beam. It opens the door to a really sweet new technology pulled right from the screens of science fiction, though, and most days, that’s good enough for us.



What is next beam me up Scotty?  I wonder how much signaling traffic that would cause?  Tonia



Diameter Market is Accelerating....


Bellow are some excerpts from an article written by Current Analysis, Inc. pertaining to the Signaling that is occurring due to the increasing traffic in Diameter.  Current Analysis presents an interesting discussion around the  Diameter Signaling Traffic Model created by Diametriq and Tekelec.  These have proven to be invaluable tools in the search for what is driving traffic and assisting in the decision making process of what to do to it all flowing smoothly.

Taking the Pulse of the DSC Market: From ‘Signaling Storm’ to ‘Good Signaling’ Snow, David October 22, 2012 Market Advisory Report


There is no doubt about the fact that the Diameter market is accelerating. All companies with DSC products report an increase in RFP activity.Restricted budgets, doubts over capacity, and timescale requirements for DSCs are holding carriers back, and ‘scare tactics’ in the market have made them wary.  Enter the Diameter Signaling Traffic Model.
This new approach is epitomized by the publication of Diameter signaling traffic models. Both Tekelec and Diametriq issued their initial versions in September, and although the models differ in several respects, the objective is the same: to justify the assertion that good Diameter signaling traffic will increase and to show how and why. Perhaps more importantly, interactive versions are accessible to service providers for experimentation, and it is reported that they are actively using these models as an initial step in determining their own DSC requirements.

Not Included in the Box
Both Tekelec and Diametriq wisely caution that their models are only intended as a first step, with key parameters typically being the number of devices, the speed of introduction of LTE and the migration to VoLTE. Later models are planned to address the next logical step:
LTE roaming and the trickier aspects of inter-working with 2G/3G.

Near Term Drivers
• An LTE Attachment Disorder Is Coming: With the rollout of LTE, just attaching to the network will initiate a sequence of Diameter signaling messages in the core.

Competitors promoting DSC products should consider following the example of Tekelec and Diametriq in publishing interactive Diameter signaling traffic models. Despite reservations concerning the sophistication of these models compared with internally used versions, such models can be a valuable source of lead generation and typical customer network parameters. Additionally, they can be used to show case
company expertise by highlighting parameters linked to product USPs.

To see the article in its entirety it can be purchased from:

Current Analysis, Inc.
21335 Signal Hill Plaza , Second Floor, Sterling, VA 20164
Te l: 877-787-8947
Fa x : +1 (703) 404-9300

http://www.currentanalysis.com



Monday, October 22, 2012

Possible Routes for Data Traffic


What is a typical teenager doing while on their way to school on the bus, riding in the car with their parents to the store, or just sitting with friends on the patio(certainly not swimming, playing, or talking) they are watching movies.  Whether it is just a short YouTube video or a full length flick, they are becoming the past time of many more of the youth around the world each and everyday.
According to Cisco's latest predictions Mobile video will be 71% of all mobile data traffic. Video consumption may not make up the majority of the time on mobile, but of course it takes a whole lot of data.  So once again one must take notice of the possible future congestion and what must be done as a preventative measure.

Let us here at Diametriq assist in the measurement of the flow by using the:


fp-header-traffic-jam

NEW!! LTE Diameter Traffic Calculator

Friday, October 12, 2012

New White Paper

Impact of the LTE Migration for MVNOs


Click to visit New Whitepaper! Impact of the LTE Migration for MVNOs    Dan Wonak


Wireless operators around the world are upgrading their networks to LTE. This means not just the addition of new network elements like the P-Gateway and the S-Gateway, but also a fundamental change to the underlying signaling from SS7 to Diameter. Mobile virtual network operators (MVNO) – who typically have their own billing system and policy controller framework – depend on the mobile network operators (MNO) to provide them the underlying wireless network infrastructure. They need to communicate with each other via standardized (or proprietary) interfaces and are significantly impacted by this migration to LTE.  A Diameter Protocol Converter can convert, not just between disparate diameter variants, but also to SOAP/SS7 and other proprietary interfaces and assist MVNOs manage the migration to LTE.

Webinar: MVNO Strategies for 4G/LTE Migration

Driving the MVNO business is a full-time activity.


Last of your challenges should be worrying about protocol interface to your MNO partner’s infrastructure.
As MNOs migrate from 3G to 4G LTE, their core network infrastructure evolves into a new avatar: the Control Plane is now built around Diameter, the signaling protocol that governs policy, charging and subscription management. While your MVNO network traditionally speaks SS7 protocols (CAMEL/SOAP/RADIUS/WIN/GSM MAP or other variants), your partners’ Network Elements have now moved to Diameter and its supported interfaces (S6a, S6d, S13, S13′, Gy, Ro and others).
The Result? Your 3G Billing servers are now required to support 3G and 4G Network Elements in the MNO network!
Solution! Plug in DIAMETRIQ’s DRE – Diameter Routing Engine™ which performs all the necessary Inter-working between your current Billing interfaces and your MNO partners 3G / 4G elements!
Diametriq’s DRE provides interworking, load balancing and redundancy and is customizable on the fly! You may decide to bring in additional protocol support as required!
Now you may focus on driving. And leave MNO interfacing challenges to DIAMETRIQ!!





The arrival of 4G/LTE has opened up new opportunities for MVNO’s to offer distinguishing data plans and services. However, before that is possible, MVNO’s and MVNE’s have to get familiar with a completely new network architecture, a host of new network elements and a fundamentally new communication protocol called Diameter. Diameter impacts all interfaces like billing, prepaid, policy etc. In this seminar we will discuss strategies for MVNO’s to deal with challenges related to LTE signaling.
The following is the time and date of the Webinar just click and you will be taken to the link for the Webinar.  Enjoy...

Thursday, October 25, 2012 11:00 am to 12:00 pmEastern Daylight Time (New York, GMT-04:00)


How much of a concern is signal traffic


This article came from an interview with Thomas Henze, Deutsche Telekom it was conducted by Mark Callender, Conference Producer Broadband Traffic Management Series in a pre-event promotion.  Mr. Henze will be a speaker at the LTE Direct Event on November 8th 2012, where he will be presenting a case study concerning Enabling proximity based services with “LTE Direct”.  He will also be discussing increasing the amount of connected devices and how it will affect signaling traffic.  Below is an excerpt of this interview.

How much of a concern is signal traffic caused by the increasing number of connected devices?
Different from some underestimations of the signaling as well as data usage traffic in the past, we have to actively manage possible consequences of the introduction of proximity services in the mobile networks. This means, for "LTE Direct" we will have to consider the impact of signaling traffic from the very beginning and design the technical solution accordingly. And lets not forget: Mobile access and the use of licensed spectrum are the most powerful tools - owned by operators - to manage huge numbers of connected devices in dense areas. First assessments and simulations have shown results proving this statement.

This increase of traffic due to the proximity of services that Steve is talking about in this article can be used to support the need for a tool to calculate the influence this will have on signaling traffic.  If it is known in advance what the level of traffic will be in a given instance, preparations can be made.  You cannot bring the baby home without a crib.  Diametriq's Diameter Traffic Calculator™ is just what the doctor ordered.  The tool can be used to calculate signaling traffic and stop congestion and bottle necks before they occur by assisting operators in understanding the weak points in their networks.  


Tonia Eynon